3.03.2007

What is a "C & D" letter?

Cease and desist (also called C & D) is a legal term essentially meaning "halt" or "end". It is used in demands for a person or organization to permanently stop doing something (to cease and desist from doing it).

The term is used in two different contexts: A cease-and-desist order can be issued by a judge or government authority, and has well-defined legal meaning. A cease-and-desist letter can be sent by anyone, although typically they are drafted by a lawyer.

Cease-and-desist letters
A cease-and-desist letter is a letter demanding that the recipient stop continuing a certain behavior. The behavior in question can include publishing materials or making statements that the letter's sender considers copyright infringement, trademark infringement, patent infringement, slander, or libel. The letter typically threatens legal action if the recipient continues to publish the materials in question or make statements similar to the ones in question. It is similar in form, although not in function, to a demand letter, which alerts the recipient to a pending claim for money damages, usually as a result of a tort or a breach of contract.

There have been criticisms from civil liberties and free speech groups that cease-and-desist letters may be used by wealthy individuals and corporations to bully their less-monied opponents into silence, as many people will comply with even an unjustified cease-and-desist letter due to their unwillingness to engage in an expensive lawsuit. Such groups call this a chilling effect on free speech.

In the US, a recipient of a cease-and-desist letter put in a "reasonable apprehension" of litigation may respond through a request for declaratory judgment proceeding in his own jurisdiction.

A Cease and Desist Letter can also be drafted by a person who is being continually harassed and/or intimidated by an individual or a group.


Court orders
A cease-and-desist order is an order from a judge or government ordering a halt to an illegal activity. This prohibition is sometimes done as the outcome of a trial, in which case it is a permanent injunction against the activity, and sometimes done as an emergency measure to prevent possibly irreparable harm, in which case it takes the form of a temporary injunction. An injunction against speech issued before it occurs (e.g. preventing a pending publication) is called prior restraint.


Administrative agencies
Many government administrative agencies also have the ability to issue cease and desist orders. Government agencies frequently issue cease and desist orders to halt the sale of unregistered or fraudulent securities, to halt unsafe banking practices, and to enforce licensing statutes. Frequently, these orders will contain a period of time for the subject of the order to request a hearing. If a hearing is not requested, the cease and desist order will become final and the agency will be able to enforce its order in a court of law.

3.02.2007

Where can I get a flash game arcade script?

Easy answer:

www.MyGameScript.com

Mygamescript.com is run by a friend of mine, Kawing. I've done several business transactions with him, all of which were flawless.

My Game Script is a simple yet powerful script, enabling you to run your own flash game arcade website with full control. They have several different packages available to suit your needs, the Basic Package enables you to set up an empty game arcade, where you can manually upload and add your own games through the sophisicated admin panel. They are also happy to offer the Standard Package (300+ flash games) and the Super Size Package (1,350+ flash games) to start off your arcade. They also have the biggest game pack in the Mega Size Package (2,300+ flash games). All of their packages are very affordable and offer great value for money. They would recommend shopping around but we doubt you'll find a better deal.

For further information visit them at Mygamescript.com or email support@mygamescript.com.

What is overture? Where is it located?

I may have answered this question once before, but here it is again.

Overture is the number of time a word or words are searched in Yahoo each month. The overture tools are located here:

Search Term Suggestion Tool - USA / USA
Search Term Suggestion Tool - UK / UK
Herramienta de sugerencia de palabras - Spain / España
Suggestion de mots cl? - France / France
Search Term Suggestion Tool - Austria / Österreich
Search Term Suggestion Tool - Germany / Deutschland
Suggeritore di parole chiave - Italy / Italia
Search Term Suggestion Tool - Japan
Search Term Suggestion Tool - Korea
Tref woord suggestie -tool - The Nederlands / Nederlands
Search Term Suggestion Tool - Switzerland / Schweiz
Search Term Suggestion Tool - Australia / Australia
Ferramenta de Sugestão para Termos de Busca - Brazil / Brazil
Værktøj til Søgeords- Forslag - Denmark / Danmark
Hakutermien ehdotustyökalu - Finland / Suomi
Verktøyet for søkefraseforslag - Norway / Norge
Verktyg för förslag på söktermer - Sweden / Sverige
搜尋 字串 建議 工具 - Taiwan
Russian Yandex Wordstat

Who is "Microsoft Legal?"

We've all noticed MICROSOFT LEGAL on the domain name forums. The man behind the mask is Aaron Kornblum. I've spoke with him on multiple occassions and he is a great guy. Here is a Q/A session with him from 2005.

REDMOND, Wash., Feb. 10, 2005 — The joke about e-mail inboxes filling with pitches for Viagra or other erectile dysfunction medication is almost a cliché - industry analysts estimate about a quarter of all spam involves solicitations for Viagra or an illegal, non-FDA-approved, potentially hazardous generic. But Pfizer Inc, the maker of Viagra (sildenafil citrate), does not find it funny. Nor does Microsoft, which for the last two years has been waging a multi-pronged attack on the barrage of spam streaming into Internet users' inboxes.

But it may be Pfizer and Microsoft who ultimately have the last laugh, after teaming up to investigate two international spam rings allegedly selling Viagra generics manufactured overseas. Today, the two companies filed lawsuits aimed at shutting down those spam rings, making them the latest in a series of strikes by Microsoft against spammers. Combined, the two companies today filed a total of 17 new actions against defendants they claim are involved in the sale and advertising of potentially harmful medications. The defendants allegedly sent hundreds of millions of e-mails using illegal and deceptive techniques that violate the year-old federal CAN-SPAM law (the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003) and other state and federal laws.

PressPass talked to two members of Microsoft's Internet Safety Enforcement team, Attorney Aaron Kornblum and Senior Investigator Stirling McBride, as well as Pfizer Chief Corporate Counsel Marc Brotman, about the alliance with Pfizer and the joint investigation that led to today's anti-spam lawsuits.

PressPass: How did Microsoft and Pfizer come to work together against spam?

Kornblum: Today's actions are the result of initial conversations with Pfizer which began last summer. Pfizer contacted us because they were receiving unwanted attention for e-mail spam advertising Viagra, which was troubling for several reasons. First, many people were blaming Pfizer for this spam. Second, Pfizer was concerned because the products people were purchasing online through this spam scheme were not Viagra. Lastly, Pfizer was concerned because its intellectual property, such as trademarks, was being used in the illegal spam e-mail, as well as on the Web sites the spam e-mails were directing people to in an effort to deceive consumers into believing the sites were associated with Pfizer.

Brotman: One consumer sent a letter to our CEO, screaming about all the Viagra e-mail he was getting - he said he received 20 in one day, and several thousand in just a few months. The fact is, Pfizer does not send spam. This is a very strict company policy. It wouldn't make sense - we do not sell Viagra directly to consumers, so we would not send out e-mail offering the product directly for sale. All of the e-mails people are getting that offer Viagra for sale, or cheap or generic Viagra - none are supported by Pfizer in any way. In fact, most of these sites are not offering Viagra, but counterfeits that may contain contaminants, may not work, or worse yet, could make people sick.

We felt we could fight back on the sale and advertising of the products, but our problem was that we didn't feel we had a good way of stopping the spammers. Then I happened to read a newspaper article about how aggressive Microsoft had been in battling spam, and was one of the leading companies in fighting the spam problem. So it made sense - Pfizer is an advanced company in fighting illegal generics and counterfeit drugs on the Internet, and Microsoft is advanced in the fight against spam, so jointly we could achieve more than we could separately. We together leveraged the expertise and legal claims that individually we might not have been able to.

PressPass: How did the actual investigation come together?

Kornblum: Knowing of our work at Microsoft in the spam and cybercrime-enforcement space, Pfizer telephoned our team to talk about how we might work together to stem the tide of these illegal solicitations involving their product. Last summer we began to investigate these cybercriminals on a joint basis, and uncovered two international spam rings we believe promoted Viagra and other pharmaceutical products through illegal spam. We coordinated a team of investigators and lawyers and went after these spammers together. Microsoft is targeting the defendants for sending hundreds of millions deceptive spam e-mails over its networks, and separately Pfizer is targeting these related defendants in parallel lawsuits for hosting the Web sites that misuse their intellectual property. So we're coming after this spam from two directions, which I think is an approach not taken before, and is unique to both companies.

PressPass: What are the lawsuits resulting from the joint investigations?

Kornblum: Our efforts together have led to a combined total of 17 lawsuits today against pharmacy-related defendants by the two companies. Each company filed parallel lawsuits against two separate international spam rings. Microsoft is suing each ring for alleged illegal spamming, and concurrently, Pfizer is suing each of these rings for trademark infringement and dilution, and unfair competition.

Both companies today are also filing separate and additional legal actions: Microsoft is filing three other lawsuits against other alleged pharmaceutical spammers and Pfizer is filing 10 lawsuits against other defendants, claiming improper use of Pfizer trademarks in domain names, such as bioviagra.com. So overall, there are 12 actions being filed by Pfizer and five by Microsoft.

PressPass: How would you characterize the partnering and cooperation?

McBride: I would say that the investigation that resulted in today's legal actions with Pfizer was a fantastic model of cross-industry cooperation. Pfizer has been a great company to partner with, and our aims were very complementary - Microsoft was focused on spam and Pfizer was focused on fake pharmaceuticals. So because we believe these investigative targets were using spam to advertise the fake pharmaceuticals, it was a natural place for us to come together and join forces - an obvious alliance. We shared all the work of the investigation and shared all the costs associated with the investigation - I would characterize Pfizer as a great partner in anti-crime. Another cross-industry success story was our collaboration with Amazon.com last year against spammers who spoofed Amazon.com's domain name and sent large quantities of illegal spam over Microsoft's networks and to our customers. We've also teamed up with other industry partners and government and law enforcement entities in unique and collaborative ways to fight spam and cybercrime.

Brotman: Microsoft, from day one, has been incredibly enthusiastic about our collaboration. Our work together uncovered more than just the defendants to our lawsuits - there were a couple of times where we found a site that we thought was a problem but turned out not to be. But that was a positive as well, since it meant that this site is legitimately selling real stuff. Also in this case, one of the sites we initially thought could be important was registered to someone in our backyard, in New York state. In our investigation together, we found the person who is registered as owning the domain name. It turns out that individual had no clue his identity was being used. We found out he's just a victim too, just like a number of consumers who buy from these scams.

PressPass: Were these common or typical spam operations?

McBride: Every spam outfit out there has its own characteristics. One of the things we're still looking into in our work with Pfizer is exactly how this particular spam ring operates. Typically, though, there are a lot of similarities among spam operations. In this case, we did see a fairly common setup known as an affiliate program. This means there is a central Web site that has the products for sale, and the person running the ring hires a group of people to advertise the site and drive people to the site - do the actual spamming, in other words. These are the affiliates. Each of them sends out spam to a large number of recipients, and embedded in each spam e-mail is a link to the site they want people to visit. Embedded in the link is an affiliate tag, frequently a number, so when the recipient clicks that link and goes to the Web site, the site detects this tag, indicating where the visitor comes from and who referred them, and gives credit to the spammers for customers and potential customers. These people work really hard to insulate and cover themselves, masking their identities to make it hard for companies or law enforcement to determine who they are.

PressPass: Have law-enforcement organizations been involved in this cooperative effort?

Kornblum: To this point in our joint investigation, criminal authorities have not been involved. As we go forward, we certainly will consider all our options as we learn who is responsible, and consider all of our potential next steps. Microsoft does work frequently and quite closely with law enforcement on Internet safety investigations and have referred cases to law enforcement. We regularly partner with law-enforcement agencies and governments, both here and abroad, providing technical expertise and other support to investigations and to government enforcement actions, including technology tools to help them develop their own leads.

Globally, we've now supported more than 125 legal actions against spammers - including filing 94 civil suits in the United States - with many in conjunction with governments throughout Asia, Europe and Latin America. Many are still ongoing but many have led to judgments or injunctions. Among our biggest actions:

• In January Microsoft provided support to the attorney general of Texas, Greg Abbott, in his lawsuit filed against world's fourth-largest spam ring. Microsoft also filed a lawsuit against this spam operation.

• In 2004 we supported attorneys general spam enforcement actions in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, as well as various Federal Trade Commission enforcement work.

• In 2003, we teamed with New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer in an effort that led us to the world's third-largest spammer and a number of his affiliate programs.

• We have partnered with AOL, EarthLink and Yahoo! to establish the Anti-Spam Technical Alliance (ASTA) and have twice joined together to filed lawsuits against spammers, including the first batch under CAN-SPAM when the federal law was newly enacted.

• We filed the first lawsuit against a so-called bullet-proof Web hosting service, a service which helps spammers set up shop with minimal risk of being shut down.

• We filed the first lawsuits under a new provision of the CAN-SPAM federal law called the 'brown paper wrapper' clause referring to improper labeling of e-mails with sexually-explicit content.


Our anti-spam containment efforts span product and practice groups across Microsoft with vast resources being invested in other anti-spam areas like technological innovation in spam filtering and e-mail authentication, global consumer education and so on. But our team of professionals is on the job every day, identifying these cybercriminals and taking them offline. We have changed the economics of spam and will continue to do so.

PressPass: Why does Microsoft feel it is important to fight spam so energetically?

McBride: Microsoft is dedicated to providing its customers with the best online experience they can have - spammers work hard to spoil that experience with unwanted and potentially fraudulent e-mail. We're deeply committed to combating any effort that diminishes our customers' user experience. We're doing that by using the tools in our arsenal, such as capitalizing on laws such as CAN-SPAM and other state and foreign laws to raise the stakes in the spam game. Microsoft is using its position in the industry to help protect its customers, by putting up barricades to spammers' success and making the risk for the spammer not worth the reward. Spammers make a lot of money if they're successful, so part of what we're doing is upping the cost of business - sending spam isn't so cheap if it means they have to hire an attorney, pay civil or criminal costs, or even go to jail in some cases.

Kornblum: Our customers have told us spam creates real challenges for them. We don't want personal or business communications impeded, or in any way impacted by the spam out there. We recognize it's going to take a comprehensive effort, so we're developing technology tools, such as continually enhancing our SmartScreen learning filters for Hotmail and Microsoft Outlook, as well as collaborating with industry partners to realize the adoption of Sender ID, an e-mail authentication technology to detect forged domain names. We're helping to educate our customers on how they can protect their e-mail address and fight spam. We're working on new legislative issues relating to emerging online threats such as phishing and spyware,. And we're working on new enforcement initiatives with industry leaders like Pfizer, Amazon.com, Earthlink and Yahoo!. There's still a lot to do, but we're achieving significant successes, such as putting spammers out of business or in jail, or our SmartScreen technology blocking upwards of 90 percent of spam from reaching our Hotmail customers. The cumulative impact of all these steps together is making a difference.

PressPass: Is there anything the typical computer user can do to help fight spam?

McBride: One of the things people need to do is employ the same common sense online as they do in the real world. Suppose someone was to call you on the phone or show up at your door and tell you they were from MSN or your bank and that they had inadvertently lost all your account information. Chances are all of us would hesitate to give it to them without some effort to find out their identity or their legitimacy. But if this same enquiry comes from e-mail, a lot of people just hand over that personal information. People just need to use common sense and treat business over e-mail just like they would treat any other kind of business.

Where can I sell IDNs?

There are a few places to sell IDNs:

DNforum.com
IDNforums.com
Namepros.com

These are primarily the popular domain name forums, though IDNforums.com deals almost solely with IDNs.

Reported Domain Sales

Mon. Feb. 19, 2007 - Sun. Feb. 25, 2007

Refresh.com $115,000
PopupBlocker.com $75,000
Moka.com $72,223
Career.net $52,500
Office.de €38,200 = $50,540
Submission.com $42,000
SexVedio.com (typo) $42,000
SexVidoes.com (typo) $41,250
Buff.com $40,500
BloodTest.com $40,251
LatinoPorn.com $40,000
Maklare.se ("broker" in Swedish) 275,000 SEK = $39,366
Villa.de €27,500 = $36,383
NudeBollywood.com $35,250
Dressy.com $34,501
Hentei.com $30,250
BollywoodNude.com $30,250
XXXCams.com $30,000
Lagenhet.se $28,648
FruitGiftBaskets.com $26,250

Source: DNjournal.com

2.28.2007

Domain Scams and How to Avoid Them

Domain Scams and How to Avoid Them

On any given day hundreds of different scams are launched and scores of fraudulent sites spring up to dupe consumers. Websites such as AllForDomains.com, EveryDayIncome.com, and Domains.Profit.com were all created to scam inexperienced domainers.

The basic concept of these scam sites requires an “interested buyer” and a naïve domain seller. In the case of the AllForDomains.com scam, the seller receives a promotional email for a one-time free trial advertisement in order to sell their domains. Soon after posting the advertisement an interested buyer contacts the seller and requests an appraisal. The seller is then offered several appraisers including AllForDomains.com which also happens to be the cheapest option. The seller pays to get the domain appraised and attempts to reply to the prospective buyer but never gets a response.

Similarly, EveryDayIncome.com requires the seller to promote their domain names through their advertisements. The seller will receive three or more responses from interested buyers. A clever domain seller was able to catch that although the emails appeared to be coming from three separate domainers the incoming mail header signified that they had all come from the same mail server.


To the untrained eye these sites may appear to be legitimate. However, domainers should exercise caution when appraising their domains by only using trustworthy sites or services that have been recommended by others who have had positive experiences. Thanks to those who have spread the news about such bogus sites and it appears that EveryDayIncome.com and Domains.Profit.com are no longer in operation.

Create an informative web site to warn others of domain scams and shed light on the domain industry with domains such as InternetAdvisors.org, FraudExaminers.com, InternetFraudWatch.com and InteractiveConsultants.com. Achieve your entrepreneurial goals and establish your online business with memorable and marketable domains such as ChatHelp.net, EducatorSite.com, HelpfulWebsites.com, and CyberSpeak.com


Source: Sedo.com

How do I sell to endusers?

Great question. I have been selling to end users over the past few months. This is a good way to get maximum profit from your domain name. Lets take ScienceMuseums.org as an example. What I do is simply email any Science Museums that I can find in Google. Tailor each email to the person that you're sending the email to because you don't want to spam them. Send out each email individually. You can only expect 1 person to reply out of 10 emails that you send out, and only 1 out of 100 may be interested in the domain name. Be sure to include your Full name and a phone number where you can be contacted.

EXAMPLE:

Mr. Smith,

I am currently selling ScienceMuseums.org and I thought that your company might be interested. The current asking price is $2,000. I can provide professional references upon request. Please reply regardless, the asking price may be negotiable.


Thanks in advance,

Justin T Godfrey
(307) 220-7075

2.27.2007

Nearly 4,000 Domain Names On the Block During Live and Silent Events

-- Nearly 4,000 Domain Names On the Block During Live and Silent Events --


POMPANO BEACH, Fla., Feb. 27 /PRNewswire/ --

Moniker, the first and only provider of Domain Asset Management(TM), today announced several additional high value domain names will be available during its exciting
Live and Silent Auctions held at T.R.A.F.F.I.C. West on Wednesday, March 7,
at 2:30 pm PST, at The Venetian Resort, Hotel and Casino, Las Vegas.

T.R.A.F.F.I.C. West attendees and proxy bidders will be able to place
bids at the Live Auction or via the Web in the silent domain auction.

New domain names added to the auction catalog include:

* AirlineTickets.net * LimousineService.com
* AntiVirusSoftware.com * MedicalRecord.com
* Bourbon.com & Whiskey.com * Pizza.mobi
* Carbs.com * Plans.com
* CheapGames.com * RealEstate.mobi
* Closings.com * Ringtones.net
* ConsumerElectronics.com * Settlement.com
* CurbAppeal.com * Singles.mobi
* Debit.com * SlideShow.com
* Directions.mobi * SpecialOffer.com
* FamilyPhotos.com * Spend.com
* FashionPolice.com * SportingGoods.com
* FreshFood.com * Televisionshows.com
* Friendships.com * Text.com
* GarageSales.com * Transplant.com
* HealthcarePlans.com * TruckLeasing.com
* HomeForeclosures.com * VideoShop.com
* Homerun.com * WeightLossPills.com
* InsuranceQuotes.com


To see a complete list of the nearly 4,000 domain names that will be up
for auction at either the Live or Silent event please visit
https://marketplacepro.moniker.com/files/Master_Auction_Domain_List.xls


"The auctions at T.R.A.F.F.I.C. West are poised to be our biggest
ever," said Monte Cahn, co-founder and CEO of Moniker.com. "Businesses,
investors, and domainers alike, see the value of the viable domain names
that Moniker brings to auction. Domain names cover every vertical, from
finance to travel and politics to shopping, making this event important for
business and domineers who are looking for a new gem to add to their
investment portfolios."

To take part in the live bidding, one must be a registered attendee of
T.R.A.F.F.I.C. West, which runs March 5-8, 2007. Though the conference is
sold-out, individuals and companies interested in proxy bidding can contact
sales@moniker.com for additional information on how to participate.


Unique Domains Also Available at Online, Silent Auction

Moniker will also host an online Silent Auction in conjunction with the
Live Auction in Las Vegas with thousands more names to bid on. The silent
auction will run online March 6, through March 14, 2007. The Silent Auction
provides additional opportunities for individuals to purchase domain names
that will support their overall portfolio.


Domain Financing Available

Moniker, along with its partner Domain Capital, will offer domain
financing to leverage domain purchases made at this event or for other
transactions. Moniker and Domain Capital are pioneers at using domain
values as collateral, and have been working together to offer financing
solutions for virtual real-estate for years in a fashion similar to real
estate mortgage financing.


Auction Broadcast in Real Time on WebmasterRadio.FM

The Live Auction will also be broadcast live on WebmasterRadio.FM,
keeping proxy bidders up to speed on the action in Las Vegas. Tune in by
visiting http://www.webmasterradio.fm/. WebmasterRadio is the premier free
online radio network focused on the B2B marketplace. During the auction,
listeners will be able to join the chat room and connect with peers in real
time.


About Moniker

Moniker is the first and only provider of Domain Asset Management(TM),
a complete set of business services that provide companies a
single-point-of- access to help manage and maximize the value of their
domains. These services include name creation, registration, acquisition,
portfolio management, appraisal and escrow services, traffic monetization
and after-market sales -- all backed by unsurpassed customer service and
security.


With more than a decade of experience, Moniker is a top 10 domain
registrar, holds the industry's highest customer retention rate and
pioneered the industry's first domain appraisal formula. It is considered
the industry's premier marketplace to buy and sell domain names. Customers
include savvy investors, Web entrepreneurs and forward-thinking global
companies, including Marchex, Nokta, Future Media Architects, AOL, Yahoo,
the National Hockey League, Major League Baseball, Lions Gate Films, Bank
of America, Microsoft, Jupitermedia, Geosigns, Mainstream Advertising and
many others.


Moniker, with headquarters in Pompano Beach, Florida, is an operating
unit of Seevast Corporation, a company of marketing services firms that
drive sales, build brands and leverage core assets for their clients.

Where can I find a domain name sales agreement?

There are several located on the internet, but I went ahead and found one. I also added a Non-Disclosure agreement (NDA), just remember to modify the exisiting info. Feel free to download it for free:

Download it here.

2.25.2007

Looking back on the crash

Its been almost 7 years since the dot com crash in March of 2000. I have always been interested in stories of how people made millions..this is an article that ran on the five year anniversary of the dom com boom and details what exactly went wrong.

As celebrations go, it will be a muted one. But at 9pm this evening, anyone who tried and failed to make a fortune in the dotcom boom can be forgiven for sitting back, pouring themselves a glass of millennium bubbly, and thinking about what might have been.

It will mark exactly five years since the Nasdaq, the US technology index, closed at a dizzying peak of 5048.62 - more than double its value just 14 months before. That Friday night, the young investors who had won millions in funding at networking events such as First Tuesday - and who were pumping much of that cash into marketing their patches of dotcom turf - probably felt little reason to worry. The net was the future, and they were part of it.

It was all downhill from there. In the next day of trading, the Nasdaq lost 2.8% of its value. The day after - as Lastminute.com floated on the London stock exchange, briefly achieving a market capitalisation of £800m - it fell 4%. By October 2002, it had plunged to 1114.11, a total loss of 78% against its peak.

Along the way, companies such as Boo.com, Clickmango.com, Ready2Shop.com, Pets.com, Toysmart.com and many more went from being leaders of a revolution to tombstones in dotcom graveyards chronicled by the likes of Fucked Company - and the business pages of a delighted tabloid press.

Survivors, of which Lastminute was one, were left battling to turn a profit in a market where business to consumer websites were as unfashionable as a fur coat in summer.

Rob Hersov, then boss of Sportal - now vice-chairman of executive plane company NetJets - says the collapse was precipitated by nothing less than "mass market hysteria".

"Those were incredibly heady days," he says. "Fun - absolutely. We thought we were making a difference. We thought we were getting out there, shaking things up, doing something no one had done before. We really were pioneers - buccaneers."

Fellow South African Brent Hoberman, who co-founded Lastminute.com with Martha Lane Fox, and who remains chief executive, describes the atmosphere as frenetic. "There was a community of young people starting businesses, everybody looking for deals - a frenetic amount of deal-making and deal activity.

"It was a time when outsiders from an industry were often more effective than insiders. Not knowing everything about an industry made you able to challenge the rules. New players see the effects of a disruptive technology more easily than a player who is already in the market."

Toby Rowland was another 20-something caught in the rush. With partner Richard Norton, he raised £3m in his first funding round for alternative health website Clickmango - which launched in 2000 with ads fronted by Joanna Lumley - but had to close in the wake of the crash.

Even the name of the company - because "older women love mangos", says Rowland, with a grin - was a measure of the exuberance of the times.

"When 1999 came along it was a wonderful time when everything seemed possible - and you couldn't not do something," he says.

"The intoxicating smell in the air was that of dotcom money being made left and right," agrees Tristan Louis, a developer who worked at Boo.com's London office. "Those of us that had been in the business for a while were worried about it being a bubble. But we worried for so long - in internet time - that by 1999, the worry turned to concern that maybe we were among the ones who didn't "get it", who didn't really understand the power of the net.

"It felt a little like our wildest expectations about the transformational power of the net were being exceeded at a faster rate than we thought."

As spring 2000 came, many had a sense of impending trouble. Sportal's Hersov said he knew by then that the boom was too good to be true - but he had already become involved in a costly race to make a profit before the market fell away.

His site owned potentially valuable wireless and broadband rights, in perpetuity, to a list of major European football clubs - Real Madrid, AC Milan, Juventus, Bayern Munich and Paris St Germain - and he believes that if he had sat on them and done nothing, Sportal would now be a billion-dollar company. In the end, he ended up selling the websites for £1 in November 2001.

"Everyone felt like they could get in and out in time," he says. "And I reckon most rational people knew the market would come off. People were saying: 'it's going to come off 10%, 15%' - that was the rational thing to think, not 50%. No one expected the complete meltdown; they expected the market to start dropping, but not to melt."

Julie Meyer, co-founder of First Tuesday, puts it this way: "It's not that I didn't think it was coming. It was that you never see the shape of things until it happens."

The first crack was the collapse of Boo.com. The e-clothing company, founded by Swedes Kajsa Leander and Ernst Malmsten, had launched in the summer of 1999 with more than £70m of startup capital, the most ever raised by a dotcom.

Employing more than 400 people in London, New York and four European cities, it tried to sell designer clothes in 18 countries across the world - with the help of Ms Boo, an irritating avatar who needed the Macromedia Flash plug-in to work.

As a measure of just how hubristic that was, Freeserve - then Britain's top ISP, now owned by Wanadoo - had only just started offering unmetered dial-up access, which meant that few customers who looked at the site could get as far as buying clothes.

And it didn't work on an Apple Mac. Throw in the tales of Concorde flights and high living in five-star hotels, and you had the archetypal dotbomb. By the time it went bust in May 2000, Boo.com had run up more than £10m in debt.

The trouble was that Boo led to comparisons that were harmful to other businesses - particularly Lastminute.com.

"It was a bad thing for us," says Hoberman. "The parallels were very frustrating, and they were all the more easy to make because it was a man and a woman who were young, and both women were very attractive. What I said to everyone at the time was that that was about the only parallel."

But Boo's demise did focus attention on real problems that affected dotcoms: the high cost of technology, the high cost of marketing, and the fact that customers were not yet online in big enough numbers to drive e-commerce.

"The correction had to happen," says Hersov. "There was too much money chasing too many ideas, no viable revenue stream in most cases, technology that just wasn't ready for what everyone wanted it to do - the whole thing got ahead of itself."

Mike Antliff of Digital Animation Group - in those days makers of virtual newsreader Ananova, now purveyors of animated characters known as WeeMes to mobile phones - agrees. "The market wasn't mature enough. We were technology-driven. We're much more market-driven now."

Those who got their timing right, of course, made cash. Hersov may have lost out with Sportal, but the internet incubator Antfactory, which he co-founded, was sold in 2002 for £77m. Peter Wilkinson, who reputedly sketched out the idea for Freeserve on a napkin, sold his Sports Internet business to BSkyB for more than £300m. Lastminute.com turned its first quarterly profit in 2002, although it went back into the red after making a series of acquisitions in a bid to increase its scale.

And in what now seems an extraordinary piece of deal-making, the centrepiece of the boom - First Tuesday - was sold in late 2000 to an Israeli internet company, Yazam, for £26m.

Meyer, who now works as a venture capitalist for Ariadne Capital in London, says: "The art is to find a buyer that really wants what you have."

According to Hersov, though, Europeans were at a disadvantage. "You needed to be at the epicentre to make money," he says. "You needed to be based in Seattle or Silicon Valley, and you needed to have launched something in 1997. For anyone else, and that applies to most Europeans, who launched two years after that, it was very difficult to get a technical platform, team in place, revenue stream, path to profitability, go public, cash out - the time just got shorter and shorter the further you got from the epicentre."

Some, of course, are still looking forward. Lastminute.com, like many companies, has bold plans to exploit mobile devices by using location based maps, offering theatre and restaurant deals.

Rowland is philosophical about the failure of Clickmango, but now runs Midasplayer.com, a skill gaming website he describes as "to gambling as Country Life girls in pearls are to pornography". Last month, he says, the company turned its first profit.

He misses the sense of community of the early dotcom days - now, he says, there are "a lot of lone wolves out there, doing their thing".

"We need a First Tuesday," he adds. "Someone's going to have a First Tuesday and there's going to be like 500 people there. It can happen - I believe it.

"I wish Julie (Meyer) would do it. Just for fun."

Source

Picturing the dot-com boom and bust: 'Men in Gold'

What's it like to be rich in Silicon Valley? Visitors to a San Francisco Museum of Modern Art exhibit can find out by watching candid videos of seven dot-com boom-and-bust survivors who share what money means to them.

Five months ago, the museum commissioned the project, Living Pictures/Men in Gold, from French artist Silvie Blocher, who had spent hours interviewing each of the seven men. Though volunteers, they seem almost vulnerable in front of the camera while discussing their innermost thoughts--many of which can be particularly fascinating to someone who has never had a lot of money.


One entrepreneur tells of how straight out of college, after being paid $100,000 in cash, he and his girlfriend rolled around (with their clothes on) in the bills and took polaroids. It was "a moment when money was like cocaine," he says. That statement is followed by silence and then an awkward giggle.

The men were all ambitious, Blocher said in an interview on Friday. They have "an unbelievable wish to do something, even if they can't say what," she said. They also realized that there are things that money can't buy, like love, reputation and happiness. "The question of image and identity was the most interesting subject for me in these videos," she said.

Many of the men are not identified, which was a shame because it would have been interesting to see who they were, given some of the candid comments they made. One of them--Rusty Rueff, chief executive of digital-music company Snocap--does identify himself. He talks on camera about his desire to leave a legacy by contributing to his former university. "There is a sense of making sure that your life carries on past the years that you walk the earth," Rueff says. "Does anyone care about a name on a wall 20 years, 50 years, 100 years from now? I hope they do. I hope the name is still there."

Another man talks about entering grade school when he was 4 years old, after his father was killed. "When I finished school, I realized, simply, I wanted to be rich."

Several of the men made a connection between money and sex. "Money certainly is erotic," says one. "Money makes you feel big, powerful and safe. It's really delicious to have money...it means you think you can do anything you want, and you can do anything you want."

Another man makes a more direct connection to sex: "Money can be a sexual experience without an orgasm." And a third admits to having had sex in his Porsche.

One man, identified later as Mayfield Fund venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya, talks about encountering Silicon Valley's exclusive, white, inner circle. "I have not had my revenge yet on the insiders...to explode the circle from the inside," he says.

One man admits that he is "tight-fisted with money and a penny pincher." He says, "I find that is the way to build successful companies, and it's impossible to not have that pour out into your everyday life." He also talks of the devastation that the dot-com bust inflicted on San Francisco's South of Market community, where many dot-com companies were located. He talks of the empty buildings, sidewalk sales of pricey Herman Miller chairs and desks, and near giveaways of expensive computer equipment. "It all just disappeared overnight," he says sadly.

French native Jean-Louis Gassee, recognizable because of his years in the industry, first as an executive at Apple in the 1980s and then as founder of Be, humorously discusses his bad-boy reputation. "I had a reputation for being flamboyant and abrasive, and now that I'm at peace, I call myself a recovering a-hole-aholic."

To Gassee, "Silicon Valley is like Disneyland, only with technology."

The exhibit, which runs through May 13, presents a sharp contrast to another Blocher exhibit, Living Pictures/Je et Nous (I and Us), being shown right next door. The subjects of that exhibit are from a poverty-stricken Paris suburb.

Source